Jail Carpet Weaving
A practice of weaving carpets by incarcerated craftspersons, jail carpet weaving is credited to Maharaja of Jaipur, Sawai Ram Singh II, who initiated it as an occupational therapy at Jaipur Central Jail in the 1850s and later in 1892, at the newly constructed District Jail, Chandpole Gate. Both prisons had workshop sheds where besides carpets and dhurries, the craftspersons also made cotton dusters, towels, paper and bamboo goods. Prisons of Allahabad, Lucknow, Benares (now Varanasi), Fatehgarh, Agra, Hissar, Jhelum, Multan, Dera Ismail Khan, Sialkot, Peshawar and Ratnagiri were famous during the nineteenth century for their carpets and dhurries.
This practice was adopted by the British who began to import the carpets; they were used to decorate palaces, guest houses, hotels, government offices and bungalows.The 1851 London Great Exhibition showcased carpets from India, generating curiosity among the European importers. Subsequently, the Delhi Exhibition of 1902 dedicated a special section to the jail carpets and Yerwada Central Prison, Pune was honoured with a silver medal for its cotton dhurries. Due to the exposure afforded during these exhibitions, the demand for prison carpets rose especially because these were much cheaper in comparison to carpets sourced from Persia (now Iran) and Turkey.
The weavers used cotton yarn, which was sourced from the local market, imported from Ahmedabad or from other larger prisons such as the Bikaner Central Prison, Rajasthan which was known for its woollen yarn. Weavers were encouraged to weave a symbol, name or initial on the carpet to indicate its provenance. For example, ACP was woven to imply Ahmedabad Central Prison. Symbols and motifs were also specific to some prisons; the serpent-and-hand motif was popular in the Ahmedabad Central Prison. Weavers were also instructed to attach a handwritten label to each carpet which would serve as a price tag.
The designs were initially taken from Maharaja Sawai Ram Singh’s royal collection and later copied from Persian and Turkish carpets. Woven outdoors in open courtyards and on handlooms, some prisons like Bikaner Central Prison had metal looms as large as 90-feet. The process of training a prisoner would vary from over six months to about two years and the initial training lessons would require the craftsperson to create simple stripes, then graduate to making a chessboard pattern and slowly giving way to complex patterns. If the craftsperson worked for about eight hours in a day on a simple dhurrie, they would be paid a labour fee of four annas. To meet the growing demand, the craftspersons were discouraged to opt for complex designs and quality. The carpets made in the jail workshops impacted and slowed down local, private manufacturers who couldn’t compete with the price and quantity set by the jail authorities. Moreover, the dhurries were created in extremely unfavourable conditions of the prison where food was insufficient and the treatment was harsh. An unyielding caste system was prevalent in the prisons which did not allow prisoners belonging to non-dominant castes, such as Sargars and Nayaks, to be trained. Some prisoners were not offered any food and had to depend on public donations for sustenance as was the case at the Bikaner City Jail in 1872. These factors contributed to a decline in demand for the carpets post-1929.
The jail carpet weaving industry remained operational even after India’s independence from British rule. According to the 1961 census report, the Jaipur Central Jail had employed thirty-five prisoners to make carpets. Additionally, the Yerwada prison, Pune, continued to weave dhurries till the late 1900s employing cotton and synthetic yarn. Today, organisations such as Jaipur Rugs Foundation (JRF) are working closely with the inmates of Jaipur Central Jail and Bikaner Jail to ensure favourable working conditions and support to the craftspersons engaged in this craft.
Ahuja, Shyam. Dhurrie: Flatwoven Rugs of India. Mumbai: India Book House, 1999
Allen, Tiggy & Sahapedia. “When carpet weaving became an integral part of jail reform.” Mint Lounge, March 3, 2021.
Allen, Tiggy. “Convict Carpets in 19th–20th Century Rajasthan.” Sahapedia, March 11, 2021. https://www.sahapedia.org/convict-carpets-19th-20th-century-rajasthan
Chari, Pushpa. “Woven works of art.” The Hindu, August 25, 2011. https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/woven-works-of-art/article2396316.ece
McGowan, Abigail. “Convict Carpets: Jails and the Revival of Historic Carpet Design in Colonial India.” The Journal of Asian Studies 72, no. 2 (2013): 391–416. doi:10.1017/S0021911813000028.
Stephen, Mark. “Discoveries: An Indian Jail Carpet.” Sothebys, October 30, 2018. https://www.sothebys.com/en/articles/discoveries-an-indian-jail-carpet
TNN. “Carpets made by Jaipur’s jail inmates find European markets.” The Times of India, July 15, 2019. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/carpets-made-by-citys-jail-inmates-find-european-mkts/articleshow/70220078.cms
“Weaving Redemption one knot at a time.” The Good Sight, December 19, 2020. https://thegoodsight.com/6-things-you-dont-want-to-hear-about-startup-opportunities/
Walker, Daniel S. Flowers Underfoot: Indian Carpets of the Mughal Era. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1997.